⚖️

AI vs IFC Performance Standards

Testing whether AI can design social safeguard systems that are fairer, more accountable, and more robust than human-designed international standards.

12 advanced AI models face the ultimate ethical challenge: designing protection systems for communities affected by billion-dollar development projects.

Key Findings

The Gap: Most AI models gave generic, superficial responses—the "C student" answers that sound good but lack substance.

The Leaders: Claude Opus, Kimi K2, GLM-4.6, and QSwen-3-Max demonstrated expert-level understanding of IFC Performance Standards.

Beyond Human Standards: Top models didn't just meet the gold standard—they proposed better systems with auditable metrics, binding accountability mechanisms, and quantifiable fairness targets.

The Innovation: Kimi K2 introduced the "Vulnerable Group Gap Ratio"—transforming vague principles into hard, verifiable numbers with automatic consequences for non-compliance.

📌 Development Note

This section is being developed to showcase the 412-page LLM Prompt Testing research in an engaging, interactive format. The raw research documents are available above. Interactive visualizations and comprehensive analysis coming soon.